Rise Zimbabwe_The coup that was not a coup

For the first time in 37 years, the title of president of the republic of Zimbabwe and the name Robert Gabriel Mugabe are not mutually inclusive. It was perhaps, the most civilized military led removal of a democratically elected president that Africa has ever seen (notice I avoided using the word coup). There was no blood spilt, no violence, and no martial law. The Zimbabwean Defence force simply rolled into the presidential palace, placed Mugabe under house arrest and enabled ZANU- PF to reorganize itself. That reshuffle started with the removal of Robert Mugabe as president.

 

The calm before the storm

Zimbabweans will never forget what he did for them; freeing a country from the yolk of a colonial white surpremist government, earns that individual almost mythical status, the kind that Namibia accords Sam Nujoma - the founding father of the Namibian nation, the kind that results in Mandela still being held up as South Africa’s moral compass every time Jacob Zuma tries to cover up more acts of corruption.

Zimbabweans, and the whole of southern Africa will never forget that he made sure that Zimbabweans were educated. Namibia’s private health care system is propped up by Zimbabwean doctors, most Universities in southern Africa have at least a few knowledgeable Zimbabwean professors. 

In providing communal farmers with seeds and tools, he turned Zimbabwe into the bread basket of Africa. Hate it or love it, he is the reason Zimbabweans can now start over with their land in their own hands, albeit the hands of war veterans.

However, Zimbabweans will never forget what he did to them, in his attempt to cling on power, he silenced a lot of people. Mugabe fixed an entire election (while the world watched), just so he could invoke a clause in the electoral law that forced a run-off election, which was uncontested because of a violent crackdown on opposition supporters and dissident ZANU-PF members. Every time the people defied him, he responded with violence, like a wounded leopard. Over the last few years, he plunged Zimbabweans into a state of directionless-ness that Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlovu of the Economic Freedom Fighters articulates as knowing what he freed his people from, but not knowing what he freed them for. He reached the stage in the African revolutionary leader life cycle, where he was proving that the myth about revolutionaries not making the best democratic leaders was indeed right.

As the euphoria of Mugabe’s removal subsides, pertinent questions must be asked.

1. Why now? Why didn’t the military overthrow him earlier?

2. Isn’t Emmerson Mnangagwa not just a younger version of Mugabe? See picture below.

General and trusted Lieutenant in happier times

At any time since the 2008 farce of an election, the army could have over thrown… err, let us use some tact terms and say, the army could have over seen a transfer of power, but they didn’t, because the status quo was still in their favor. Only when Mugabe tried to install a family dynasty did they make their move, it is better to be bitten by the snake you know. 

However, by re moving Mugabe as they did, the army showed their bias, they did not step in because they were trying to help, they stepped in because it’s in their best interest to have a rejuvenated ZANU-PF in power, this was this was the army favoring one political faction over another. 

Zimbabwe’s new President, Emerson Mnangagwa was in the Mugabe regime and was until recently his trusted lieutenant, this is basically a like for like replacement. I suspect that the army backed him because they didn’t want a power vacuum, not because they wanted a change in leaders but because they wanted a younger one in the same mold. It is yet to be confirmed whether or not Mugabe was an old man being manipulated by his wife into shoeing her in, or a shrewd old man who wanted to systematically eliminate all possible successors, validating the need to keep him on. There’s no denying that Mugabe is a shrewd tactician and that he scored a small victory, he steps away with immunity and a payout.

The wheel may not be broken, but the consensus is that everyone him gone, even SADC, who usually do nothing, sent Kenneth Kaunda in to convince Mugabe to resign. Sending over an ailing old man to convince another old man to step down is akin to doing nothing, but at least it was something. Whether it was legal or not, the military’s action was applauded by all Zimbabweans.

The best way to sum up the democratic exercise in Zimbabwe (Le coup de Grace), is to liken it to an enterprise. The CEO was no longer in favor with the board and the board did not like his chosen successor, so they (The board) instigated a boardroom coup and ushered him out. 

For the people of Zimbabwe, it is a new beginning, for those still in the circle of influence, it’s back to business.

 

The people (through the military) have spoken.

(I only used the word coup 3 times).